No, my own dearest, your letter does not arrive on
Saturday but this morning—what then? You will not be prevented from your usual
ways of entire goodness to me by that? You will continue to write thro’
the remainder of the writing-time? This one letter reaches me,—if another was
sent, it stays back till to-morrow– So I do get a blessing by your
endeavour, and am grateful as ever, my own Ba! After all, neither of us
loses,—effectually loses—anything—for my letter always comes in its good
time,—it is not cast hopelessly away—and do you suppose that you lose any
of the gladness and thanks? Rather, you get them doubly—for all along, all thro’
the suspense, I have been (invariably) sure of the deed, when promised, and of
the unchanging love, when only expected .. so that when the letter finds me at
last, the joy being unaccountably unabated .. do you not see that there is a
gain somehow? I told you on Friday that I loved you more at that instant
than at any previous time– I will show you why, because I can show you, I
think—tho’ it seems at first an irrational word .. for always having loved you
wholly, how can I, still only loving you wholly, speak of 'more' or
'less'– This is why: I used to see you once a week, to sit with you for an hour
and a half—to receive a letter, or two, or three, during the week—and I loved
you, Ba, wholly, as I say, and reckoned time for no time in the intervals of
seeing you and hearing from you. —Now I see you twice in the week, and stay with
you the three hours, and have letter on dear letter,—and the distance is, at
least, the same, between the days, and between the letters– I will only
affirm it is the same—so I must love you more—because if you were to
bring me back to the old allowance of you,—the one short visit, the two or three
letters,—I should be starved with what once feasted me! (If you do not
understand, Flush does!) Seriously, does not that go to prove, I love you more?
Increased strength comes insensibly thus,—is only ascertained by such processes
of induction .. once you crossed the room to look out Shelley’s age in a book, and were not tired—now you cross London to
see the trains arrive, and (I trust) are not tired .. so—you are
stronger.
Dearest, I knew your very, very meaning, in what you
said of religion, and responded to it with my whole soul—what you express now,
is for us both .. those are my own feelings, my convictions beside—instinct
confirmed by reason. Look at that injunction to 'love God with all the heart,
and soul, and strength' and then imagine
yourself bidding any faculty, that arises towards the love of him, be still! If
in a meeting house, with the blank white walls, and a simple doctrinal
exposition,—all the senses should turn (from where they lie neglected) to all
that sunshine in the Sistine with its music and painting, which would lift them
at once to Heaven,—why should you not go forth?—to return just as quickly, when
they are nourished into a luxuriance that extinguishes, what is called, Reason’s
pale wavering light, lamp or whatever it is .. for I have got into a confusion
with thinking of our convolvuluses that climb and tangle round the rose
trees—which might be lamps or tapers! See
the levity! No—this sort of levity only exists because of the strong conviction,
I do believe! There seems no longer need of earnestness in assertion, or proof
.. so it runs lightly over, like foam on the top of a wave."
Makes perfect sense to me, you cannot love God less in a Mormon church than a Buddhist monastery; you love God everywhere. Browning just makes it sound more complicated than it is.
Makes perfect sense to me, you cannot love God less in a Mormon church than a Buddhist monastery; you love God everywhere. Browning just makes it sound more complicated than it is.
"Chorley came and was very agreeable and communicative.
You shall tell me more about Mr Mathews and his review. And with respect to his
lady-friend, you will see her, I think– But first tell
me of Mr Kenyon, and yourself—how you are, and what I am to do,—when to see
you–
Now goodbye, my own Ba—“goodbye”! Be prepared for all
fantasticalness that may happen! Perhaps some day I shall shake hands with you,
simply, and go .. just to remember the more exquisitely where I once was, and
where you let me stay now, you dearest, dearest heart of my heart, soul of my
soul! But the shaking-hands, at a very distant time! now—let me kiss you,
beloved—and so I do kiss you ..
Ever your own RB"
Miss Barrett takes her turn to write and she returns again to the Rev. George Barrett Hunter, nicknamed Chiappino after the sad character in Browning's "A Soul's Tragedy":
This last bit of melodrama is more like the Miss Barrett we are used to, but now just a blip on the radar.
Miss Barrett takes her turn to write and she returns again to the Rev. George Barrett Hunter, nicknamed Chiappino after the sad character in Browning's "A Soul's Tragedy":
"So you go on wednesday to this club-dinner, really. And you come to me also on wednesday– Does
that remain decided? I have had a letter from that poor Chiappino, to desire a “last interview” .. which is
promised to be “pacific”——. Oh—such stuff!! Am I to hold a handkerchief to my
eyes & sob a little?... And I forgot to tell you that there were two things in which I had shown great want of
feeling—one, the venturing to enclose your verses—the other .. (now listen!) the
other .. the having said that 'I was sincerely sorry for all his real
troubles'. Which I do remember having said once, when I was out of patience—as
how can anyone be patient continually?—& how was I especially to condole
with him in lawn & weepers, on the dreadful fact of your existence in the
world? Well—he has real troubles unfortunately, & he is going away to live
in a village somewhere– Poor Chiappino! A little occupation would be the best
thing that could happen for him: it would be better than prosperity without it–
When a man spins evermore on his own axis, like a child’s toy I saw the other
day, .. what is the use of him but to make a noise? No greater tormentor is
there, than selflove, .. even to self– And no greater instance of this, than
this!
Poor Rev. Hunter. He had no chance. What do I mean poor Rev. Hunter? He was an idiot.
"Dearest beloved, to turn away from the whole world to
you .. when I do, do I lose anything .. or not rather gain all? Sometimes
I feel to wish that I had more to sacrifice to you, so as to prove something of
what is in me—but you do not require sacrifice .. it is enough, you say, that I
should be happy through you. How like those words are to you!—how they
are said in your own idiom!– And for myself, I am contented to think that, .. if
such things can really satisfy you, .. you would find with difficulty elsewhere
in the world than here, a woman as perfectly empty of life & gladness,
except what comes to her from your hands– Many would be happy through you—but to
be happy through only you, is my advantage .. my boast– In this, I shall be
better than the others."
Why, if you were to drive me from you after a little, in
what words could I reproach you, but just in these .. 'you might have left me to
die before'. Still I should be your debtor, my beloved, as now I am Your very own
Ba–
I told you that I was going to the chapel one
sunday——but I have not been yet. I had not courage– May God bless you!This last bit of melodrama is more like the Miss Barrett we are used to, but now just a blip on the radar.
No comments:
Post a Comment